🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously backed Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. So there was a little resistance. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.